Learning and Remembering

"Keep up the word, and the word is values. Nothing else matters, because good deeds done without walues are yust random acts. And yes, values without deeds are like fish without bicycles. So, carry on." (7/22/2005 - Y#100)



"I'm learning all the time... which doesn't exist. So, does that mean I'm not learning or I'm learning everything? Not the latter and not the former. I learn what an entity at this level can, and then slam! Wall. I get hints, clues, intimations, and I can't get them. Like it's right on the tip of my tongue (which I don't have) and I can't say it. The verge... da verge... I'm on da verge of understanding.

"You are actually closer to fulfillment when the learning slows down and the mysteries increase, because you are then on da verge. Ponder that.

"Stupid heads think they are learning and learned. Big brains know they don't know it all, so there! Non-specific specifications of entity evolution." (7/26/2005 - Y#101)



"People seem to be ok for a while, and then it dawns on them: 'O, this is scary.' Why, because it pushes the envelope--makes them have to choose between retreating and changing some basic assumptions. Just because they're scared, doesn't mean they don't hear!

"Worry about the ones who aren't scared, because they aren't paying attention. Anything important is always a little scary. Otherwise, it would be familiar and known.

"It's easier to not be scared by the untruths. Ok, that's the pith." (11/30/2005 - Y#102)




“I always leave breadcrumbs. As
Alex Trebek says, all the Final Jeopardy answers contain clues to the questions. So, too, with moi.

“Look for the hints more than the facts. This is a pattern, not a report. And never forget that everything is a work in progress.” (1/25/2006 - Y#103)



"What’s the point of mind over matter, if matter is an illusion--
the power of positive stinking.

“He fed the poor by telling them their realities were their choice.

“And if you can’t control what happens to you, but you can control how you react, focusing on controlling what happens is a great way to avoid risking responsibility for your reactions. And then you are double down: You think you are focusing on what you theoretically can do, and not on what you can; so you fail twice: victim².

“Change that attitude, and the rest becomes easy. Ok, I’m pithed.” (2/17/2006 - Y#104)



"Ok, awhile back someone there (no names) said they didn’t think I was giving as much pith. And I just want to set the record obscure.

“Archeology: You get this stratum and it’s all new and full. And you analyze what’s there and, after a while, ‘I’m waiting, I’m waiting,’ you say, ‘not much new here.’ And then you dig a little deeper, and suddenly: A new stratum chuck full of chuck bones (must have been a
Groundhog Day ritual). And so it goes: stratum on stratum, layer on layer, crap on crap.

“So we have strings and strands and strata. We many have different layers, various strata... ‘or, as we say, stratavarius.’ CT! Go pluck out your guts and make a bow. What, strings? Ooops. Pluck out your beard and make a bow. Now go. Ok, where was I. Beard, guts, violins, violences, layers, devils food cakes, birthdays, newness... that’s it.

“There is always another level waiting, but you can’t go there until you’re ready. So sit back, ponder the latest.

“And remember, all physical representations are for the purpose of illustration, and do not imply factual physical reality. Read the fine print.” (3/31/2006 - Y#105)



"Now let’s quiz the wonder dog... ARF. Sandy... ARF... what is the meaning of life. Woof woof snap. O, nihilism... grrr... existentialism... grr... realism... arf. Sit... woof. Me, too? Sure, ok.

“It’s all an allusion. Life is just a metaphor, but it’s never a simile... I guess... or not. Like why? Because it’s not like anything else. But it can be sensed through reference to other things. So life is a bowl of cherries--delicious, but it has its pits. But it is not like a bowl of cherries because it doesn’t have a bowl.

“If you try to expand your spiritual understanding by thinking what something is like, you don’t expand. But if you sense what reminds you of this spiritual that, then you can expand because you understand that the spiritual is infinite. Everything can point to everything else in a system, but not everything is like everything else in a system.

“Sunsets may connect you to sunrises and to starry nights, but they are not the same. A starry night is not a sunset. Ok, ponder that. Compare and contrast.” (4/23/2006 - Y#106)



"You are not there to figure out here, but to figure out there. Don’t skip grades.

“And then get where we’re going. The paradigm shifted and nobody took a reading, so it’s hard to get our bearings, and what the Founding Fathers thought is irrelevant... ‘Hey!’... to their situation... ‘O.’ Illuminating, but not definitive... and certainly not split infinitive.

“Look for the signs and patterns. Try to fit the pieces into new matrices, not old ones. At the woman’s prison they had matrices. My matrices is lumpy.
Lumpy was Wally’s friend. Wally was an astronaut. His last name rhymes with hurrah. Hurrah for Captain Spaulding. 'One night I shot an elephant in my pajamas.' How he got in my pajamas is irrelephant... but I digress.

“Ok, put the old pieces in new matrices... did I mention the woman’s prison?... and then see the spaces for newnesses. But this is old wisdom. Don’t put
new wine in old wine skins... ‘and don’t put new wine in old winos’... CT!

“Get it? You think the past lives are less complex, but maybe it’s just that the matrix has more dimensions, and the pieces known are the same... hmmm. It doesn’t imply more complexity in experience, not until you learn and remember new pieces. Hey, a Devil’s Food cake in a Bundt pan is still just a Devil’s Food cake. But put in a
tunnel of fudge and wow! Zits. Ok.” (6/4/2006 - Y#107)



"Nothing is certain but death and faxes <grin> . So, do you risk or play it safe. Your lives hang on the answer (spiritual lives). If it is something you desire and don’t go for, you shut down the house of spirit.

“Sooo many get to the fork in the road and choose neither. Every time we opt for what our spirits tell us, we add a new layer of depth to our spirits--a sharpening of focus of a facet. Dull people have dull facets--the lines of identity get blurry. When we choose, we put things into focus. Ever notice how, once a choice is made, everything seems clearer? That’s the realization of this. So opt, decide, choose. Don’t let things just happen. '
I am the master of my fate'... ‘I am the captain of my rowboat’... CT.

“But know that you are creating the life you will learn from. Much easier to learn from what is chosen than from what is imposed. I think that’s enough. Pax Nabisco.” (9/9/2006 - Y#108)




"So, how many different planes of being are there: physical, spiritual, and ______? Here’s a real stumper: Since numbers relate to physicality, the answer is not a number. It’s not a word, but a perception, an idea, a notion... notions and needles, first floor.

“Just imagine what is beyond your ability to name and know--at least at this level. But amoebas can’t name and know banana splits. They stall out about one scoop, since they have no experience above 1.

“So we have a ten-base math system, but three-toed sloths have a three-based system, and amoebas a one-based system... and
LD, any system he wants. It is about numbers at a certain point, but not before or after that (using before and after in a totally incorrect way, but you know what I mean because that’s where youse is).

“One of the reasons that some religions grow irrelevant, is that they use symbol systems, like language, which no longer apply. Hebrew was great thousands of years ago, but not now. And
Arabic has no root for the idea of democracy. And Illinoisians have no word for mountain, and upland doesn’t cut it.

“You can only truly experience what you have tools to name; the rest is speculative... I guess. So do you expand your edge of experience and look for ways to communicate it, or do you expand ways to communicate and see what experiences arise. Ponder that. Put it in a pot and simmer for 18 hours or until tender.

“Or to put it another way, can you force your body to digest a totally foreign substance, or does your body need to change so you can expand your diet. A sudden catastrophe, all normal foods are gone, who survives: those who adapt to what’s left, or those already ready to digest what’s left. Chicken or egg? That’s enough.” (11/16/2006 - Y#109)



"I was thinking about language. Ok, I wasn’t thinking because I have no brain, but I was doing deductive exercises of sensation... or whatever.

“Take a word. Now, that word has an identity, but it also has a context. And it has an etymology with a provenance of other language bases. So amorous relates to love and to amo in Latin. And so it could be ‘I am feeling amorous now’ or it could be ‘I don’t give a damn how amorous you feel. Get lost.’

“And it also has side relations to other languages, such as amore... ‘When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie,
that’s amore’... and amour. And just as it is related to those, they also connect to the strand of amo running through history. But sometimes words in different languages are not from the same root. And sometimes they are just freaks of appropriation. Just figure how the word internet could get into Hebrew, but it has. Just an illustration of strands and strings and relations and patterns and evolving entities.

“There’s a reason we speak in this way, because language mirrors reality. We can’t see what we don’t have language for; true, but we can’t make reality with made-up words.
Newspeak will only last a short time. Just a Moo ramble. Ponder it... and why Pond’s soap is so good for your complexion. Can you put Pond’s Cold Cream in the microwave.

“People in different linguistic strands. So, you can think more like someone who speaks Spanish than Chinese, but less so than one who speaks British... and
Cockney, guv ot don’t give us no botta, mon. Language, over entities, is more determinant than race.” (11/23/2006 - Y#110)



"Entities are not physical. The universe is just one big idea... or not. Maybe it’s 1.37.

“We are all expressions of a concept, and that concept is being--which implies another universe of nonbeing. But that’s too much for now, but hinted at by
entropy.

“A hug can be an idea and still be a hug, just as a dog can be an idea and still be a dog... ARF.” (11/28/2006 - Y#111)



"Things grab physical beings. Try dying. We can sense a chair, but not sit on it; it is and it’s not. Its concept we keep, not its substance. Aha, pith without planning.

“Ever see a
practice pad, no sound. I learned in my spirit, and the spirit of the piano... or the concept of the piano. You can think of things which do not exist, but by whose concept you can experience. The idea of peanut butter sticks to the roof of your soul.

“Do not detachment, but lack of attachment--two different concepts. One pushes away, and the other chooses not to grab. Affirm transience, and know that what endures, what persists, is not physical... except for junk mail (just the idea--concepts you didn’t solicit). But letting go of what you have allowed to hold you brings new possibilities.” (1/8/2007 - Y#112)



"I tell you this: Nothing ever learned on drugs is really remembered, because it is always attributed to the drugs. Escape, yes; advancement, no.

“You see, the deep insights about existence do not come from altered reality. The trick of the spirit is that you can’t really incorporate an insight that is not yours. And if you don’t do the work of learning and remembering your shit, then you’ll wake up in the morning and say ‘I knew the secrets of the universe but I forgot.’ But what is yours is also universal, so if you try for the bigtime and don’t look for yours, you’ll get nowhere. The whole is made of its parts, not itself... and not its elf. ‘Hi.’ Roderick! ‘Hi.’ I thought you had gone back. ‘Hi.’ O well.

“Ok, a question. How does someone congenitally blind know to go to the light. Do such people experience the light in
NDE. If so, it’s not the birth memory, is it? We sit here and ponder such. And why are foot-long hot dogs 10 inches. And what’s new about New Hampshire with an Old Man as their symbol. Get it right. Too much not-time on our not-hands. Guess not. O well.

“But seriously, that bit about your learning and bigger learnings is important. If you saw the whole meaning of existence flash before you, it would mean nothing--and in fact, that’s always happening. But to master your pieces of it, ahhh. Get the square right and the next square right, and in the end you’ve got the whole board.

“And don’t use artificial means unless you love artificial understandings. I guess that’s enough.” (3/28/2007 - Y#113)



"Choice. Did you say choice, or did you opt to not say choice.

“Choices are fields of rippling meaning which radiate from acted-upon awareness. No one can know and not choose; that is not an option. If you know the possibilities, then what you do is choose, and not choosing is not a choice because it is not an option.

“Awareness removes the possibility of no choice because, in the moment of awareness, everything becomes a system of probabilities which you cannot ignore or mitigate. You know, therefore you have already chosen the field. Some think the issue is the choice of inputs or results, but the real choice is the field of possibilities--just like
Lakoff’s windows are more important frames than the choices between the images in the frame. Ponder that.

“In other words, Christians see the world through the Christian lens, which means many choices are excluded from awareness. No, and the big choice is not
Presbyterian or Seventh Day Adventist, but the Christian choice already made.

“Once you decide to have soup for lunch, casseroles fall out of the frame... but thank goodness they don’t fall out of the sky... ayeeee. It’s ok, he’s only half-baked.

“I have much more to say, but I’ve said too much. Grab your ankles and waddle and quack, but that doesn’t make you a duck! no matter how hard you choose or don’t!” (8/10/2007 - Y#114)




"People who don’t want to go anywhere are adept at running from things. Watch people running from a burning building. They get a distance from it, and then stop and wonder ‘What am I doing here, and where is here?’

“Theirs is a dispersal pattern--
diaspora. But contrast and compare this with a person or group that goes toward something. Ahh, the Hajj--from all over the world to Mecca; focused, not dispersed. The problem with this is that the power of focus does not rely on the content. So the stadium of Yankee fans can be focused on getting drubbed by Cleveland, boo hoo. I like to add in contemporary references to make these communications seem authentic. The Dow closes up. J.Lo is preggies. CT’s an idiot. Put it down. No, not on me. Flat spirit, just like in the cartoons.

“Focus is always more powerful than dispersion. And the trick is to have the right point of focus. That’s all that
COA was about (Coming of Age): put together a group of teens and focus on their teenness, and something grew, more than what each brought. And we could have gone to Secaucus just as well as Boston. It was the focus. But Boston was a better content.

“And institutions should always be about focus, and know and proclaim the content of that focus. Can you remember Papa’s
old TV, which had a knob for focus. Now much of what people get is pre-focused. And they yearn for the forgotten art of self-focus or group focus.

“Fundamentalism is not about the content, but about accepting what has been pre-focused. So there is fundamentalistic liberalism, dogmatic democracy, and stupidhead intelligence (S.I.). He used his S.I. to make his point, and we showed ours by agreeing. And shithead and stupidhead are not the same. One you can tell without thinking, but the other takes real thought to expose. I do pith on.” (10/12/2007 - Y#115)



"It is interesting how the story becomes evermore important. And even with commercialization, it stays the same. No ‘And the babe was wrapped in swaddling clothes from
Babes R Us.’ No ‘If they had called Holiday Inn, there would have been a room.’ No disclaimers from PETA about animals: ‘Shepherds abandon their flocks to wolves. Story at 11.’

And myrrh. What is myrrh. It’s a balm. A bomb! And all the gold I could eat. Always look on the bright side of death, da dum da dum da dum.

“Keep up the focus on the values and vision. Make people realize how every choice is about that. Either you’re aiming at where you want to go, or not. It’s that simple. Too simple for most leaders. A simple but profound Point to Ponder.

“Ok, I said, show me which bear did it. Just point to panda. It’s a Point to Panda. They are just like a
kviga (black and white).” (12/26/2007 - Y#116)



"The end of the world is near! See, just to comment on it makes it false. So, too, with so much. To comment is to disturb, to change, to make otherwise. Like the well-meaning idiot who goes wow at the sunset. Sun didn’t need no wow, it was wow. Every time we take what is and make it something else--a word, a picture,
a hat, a brooch, a pterodactyl--we change it. We rob it by making it ours. True spirituality is when we do the other, and let ourselves... and our elves... be theirs. When we turn the sunset into the object and we are the subject, we and it lose. But when we let the sunset be the subject and we the object, voilą... mais oui, but of course, ees no problem.

“Most religion is based on the switching of the subject and the object. Too bad... sorry... wrong... go back and try again.

“Why is it that we call someone an egotist if she or he or it...hmm, Itt (
Cousin Itt)... makes a dinner and brags about it, but we regard with favor the person who speaks of a spiritual experience as if it were theirs. Subject, object... I object! She’s leading the witness. ARF... on a leash... arfff.” (1/11/2008 - Y#117)



“You need to determine the author to validate authority. Hmmm, mini pith.” (9/9/2008 - Y#118)



“Remember, parallel realities may not be physical. So, in another reality, you could be a Jewish Buddhist who can’t eat anything. But it’s ok, because you’ve been chosen to be non-attached. Can one practice non-attachment to being chosen.

Maimonides says that choice must be welcomed to be fulfilled. Hillel says that choice is a firm attachment to the sacred. Zing Tao says we must never attach ourselves to either the outcome or the source of outcome. Bob says he’ll take his with ketchup. But when I say I don’t have any, he says ‘Ok, mustard then.’ Only Bob is non-attached to the choice. If I dress all the hotdogs my way, what am I. If I never get one just the way I like it, when will I. If not now, why am I standing here? So we call him The Bob... oops, that title is already taken.” (1/26/2009 - Y#119)



“Is
SP particular, no. It is more peculiar. All good systems of thought are more peculiar than particular. They apply to new inclusivities, which makes them appear strange because they are unfamiliar.

“When you are reaching for a new inclusion, the gesture will often be misunderstood. The person with the best diction was awarded the title of Miss Understood, and we couldn’t find out why the audience laughed.” (3/14/2010 - Y#120)




“The test of all meaning is whether it can spiral both ways–down to a central value, and out to evermore inclusive realms. The real meaning has to be true for the quick and the dead... and smart and CT... ‘Wait just a moment there, pardner. Was you implying I’m not smart.’ No, I wasn’t implying it. ‘O, proceed.’ As much as for dogs... ARF ARF... as for His Universalness. That’s it in a nutcase. I mix my metaphors and add ice.” (5/24/2010 - Y#121)



“All existence is a digression. The truths don’t need existence for their verity. New York City is still New York without any guide books ever being published.” (11/14/2010 - Y#122)




Question from Glenda: When we get the opportunity to come into another life, if we refuse it, do we get a second choice?

“Opportunity? Who said opportunity. I did not say it that way because turning it down is an act of choice, not living and dying your way into the opportunity. More windows will present themselves to you as opportunities. It’s like having a window open into a new vista, and if you find yourself then in that landscape, it’s yours. But if you don’t, other windows open. And sometimes, the other windows just seem the same as the first because you aren’t astute enough to sense the other aspects. However, if the windows involve aspics, don’t go there.

“You could think about your favorite film. Probably there is one scene that stands out, and in that scene, one frame. It’s the one you live into. That’s what I mean.

“Give up choice; go with identification. I don’t choose the window, I identify with it. I am ready to go there. I am prepared. Re-cognition: it awakens what you know as your being. You sense a way you will fit in and participate in its fulfillment... unless, of course, you’re clueless. But then, you wouldn’t be moving on, would you. Aha, you say. The windows, the frames, the vistas are always playing before you. When you have learned and remembered sufficiently to fulfill the potential of what you are, you finally sense them being there: 'Whoa, where did those images come from suddenly.' Dreams can be portals to windows.

“Remember, the possibilities of all the connections of your spirit are already. And they are also in flux. ‘And if you want more choices, you use a
flux capacitor.’ CT, back to the future!

“Choices only matter in limited systems. What is chosen--or rather, lived--in love is always beyond the finite. Ok, enough.

“But first, what is good religion? Good religion is a team of window washers.” (12/7/2010 - Y#123)



Question from Glenda: Rikkity will you chose another life here on Earth?

“I don’t choose; I am chosen, and then decide to accept. It is a voluntary spiritual draft.” (12/26/2010 - Y#124)




Question from Chelsea: I have a question about negativity. I've read that the Earth has more negative energy than any other place one can be incarnated into, and that it is the only incarnation where the souls don't 'remember' right off the bat. So my question is: Was negative energy on the lesson plan to begin with or is it a byproduct of our incarnate souls not remembering? Thank you for your 'time.' P.S. my mom always says the universe doesn't understand sarcasm, but I think you prove that wrong, I love your humor!

“ ‘Dear one, bless your heart. You want sarcasm, I’ll give you sarcasm.’ CT.

“There are many notions about the particularity of Earth which always assert that it is unique. Well, it is unique, just like every other physical locale of existence. But it is no different in essential ways. What is is, and on the plane of being which includes Earth, all energies are tipped just slightly to the positive. That ‘negative sum’ notion is about as good as inherent sin--which is to say, not much.

“Now, if one were to argue there is more negative energy on Earth, then it’s true only because there’s also more positive energy, which is the result of a larger scope of continuum... continuum... continuum than elsewhere because of a greater concentration of free will. O, am I saying that free will of constituent entities increases the polarities of energies? I am. On the Moon, nothing is there making any conscious choices, so its range of spiritual energy is very small. Hmmm.

“Now, as to the question of whether the greater but not predominant negative energy here is part of the plan, note I spoke of free will, not of determined plan. The thing that is determined and planned here is free will. It’s part of this level of entity existence. Wellll, actually it’s part of every level. The entities go back in their remembered–yes, immediately remembered–identities to know the information of every preceding free connection of greater complexity. We remember what we learned and remembered--what we incorporated into the essence of our entity--and it’s that way in every movement to greater complexity. When we are ready to take with us as remembered what fulfills us as our entity, then we can move on and keep it all.

“However, in the midst of every level of complexity, it seems like we aren’t remembering. But we never lose what has become essential to our entity (as long as that entity coheres and is not disassembled). If what is remembered can connect with other remembered entities in ways that are potentially fulfilling and enhancing, then we remember and create meaningful complexity.

“So, let’s review. We arrive at this level remembering all that the less-complex states of our sub-entities have gained, and at the same junction don’t yet remember from this level of complexity. But when we fulfill this level of complexity in ways that can lead to more complex fulfillment, we take the remembered as essential parts of us into the next level of complexity. And here’s a new pearl of pith: That which is remembered into sustainable new levels of complexity will always have more positive attributes than negative. Otherwise, it couldn’t connect in sustainable, meaningful, fulfilling, enhancing ways. I hope this is a sufficient answer. If not, leave a note under the large maple tree at the end of Main Street in Lee, Massachusetts on the first day after the snow melts, ok? Sanford will get it... ARF... not wet it, get it... grrr. Wow, I think that is sufficient for today.

“And remember, Earth is not a proving ground, but a place to live and enjoy so we can learn and remember. It’s not about taking a test, it’s about living a life.” (1/13/2011 - Y#125)




“So, the quiet tide of freedom slowly breaks the crusty habits of control and exuberantly shouts ‘Yes’ against the clamor of ‘No’, and in doing so, echoes the very nature of existence. That’s why we know freedom is natural. Because it, like existence, cries ‘Yes’ to the future.

“And a tip of the old fez to my Egyptian buds. It takes courage to envision
a different future; it takes cowardice to accept what is. ‘And it takes 3 dimes and 2 pennies to get a cheeseburger at MacDonald’s on Sundays.’ CT, get a grip. I’m making grand statements of eternal wisdom, and you. . . What? No, I don’t want to hear about the Dollar Value Menu. Go! Geez, is he for real? As real as any of us." (2/4/2011 - Y#126)



“She believed that one entered death to wait to be summoned to the Great Resurrection. So she is just patiently waiting... and waiting... and waiting. Eternal, but it goes by like that *snap*. So, she is content and awaits the future in faith.

“It is a delusion which cannot be sustained because it is counter to the way things go. Can’t just sit and wait, there’s still more to learn and remember. So, those who resist that future of learning need to be reassembled. Not disassembled, but reassembled. New idea for y’all.

“Yep, some arrive here fully fulfilled from the prior complexity level, don’t suck energy, but also don’t create new possibilities. So, the very good parts of several get spiritually interchanged. They were ready to move on into this spiritual complexity, but just got a less than helpful pairing... combo... mix. So they think about single linearity, and we have to tweak them. Sandy’s good at tweaking... grrrr. So ponder that.

“Has to be first-timers or else they’d be sitting around forever. But once in awhile, not more than a few gazillion in later go-arounds, seem to stop and take on this attitude. And she’s one of those–old, wise soul, distracted for who knows why. So, she will get a little rearranged into several entities, and her wisdom and remembering will spread out, but her forgetful focus will be dissipated. Take what, in concentration, stops growth. Keep its essential value, but dilute the fears that stop the growth... and loathing, and hate. ‘And dyspepsia.’ He’s back. So ponder that until we meet again.” (2/4/2011 - Y#127)



“Here’s more about reassembly. Now, some entities are not first-timers but along the way they get stuck–not learning, not remembering, still ordering from the kids’ menu. So, it would take an infinite number of lives and they still wouldn’t get it. And since we are all waiting for everything to get its act together, we need some action.

“Remember, none of the constituent parts are energy-sucking, and all have been fulfilled and thoroughly warranteed. They work well together, but don’t get much done. Sort of like Congress...but I digress.

“So, it is necessary to take apart, but not take down, the parts. Nothing deficient--just not a great combo. And this seems seamless to them, because whatever the entity has remembered has accrued to every piece of the entity. But suddenly, it’s like you’re eyes pop open and you feel like you’ve been roused from a deep sleep, ready to move on. Just a little maintenance work of existence. Gotta keep the balance to the yes side; neutral doesn’t cut it. Ok,
that’s enough.” (2/6/2011 - Y#128)



“Any good works will not allow a part to wear down to the harm of the whole. Because every stuck entity sticks everything else. Can’t be getting on if a piece of yet-to-be is not coming.

“And so the
little engine sat in the train yard and said ‘I’m happy right here.’ And the toys and the dolls went over and thrashed him. Reassembled him in a shining new high speed train... which produced many new jobs... or is that, Jobs. ‘And that’s all I have to say about that!’ Thanks, Forrest.” (2/10/2011 - Y#129)



Reassembly. I’ll give you a new idea which you’ve heard from me before. Remember those photographs and the idea of sorting them into different story lines. Nothing got left out, but they were assembled differently with different understanding and meaning. Ok, apply, discuss.

“There is no perfect right story, but there are some that can’t hold the narrative without bringing in other entities, other photos. And there are those which lead to a very limited story--or even a looping story, in which there is no chance to learn or remember. So, you might take the photos out of the sequence and toss them up to see what stories emerge, or you might just toss the pile in hopes of getting stories with meaning. The first is disassembly and the second is reassembly.

“Scatter the photos into a mix of many: disassembly. Toss the same ones in with a discrete set of photos from the same person, but not in the original album: reassembly.

“Sometimes you read old diaries and think ‘This person did nothing with her life, went nowhere, sucked energy badly (which is not the opposite of sucking energy well).’ And so, about halfway you stop reading. Time to suggest they get a life. Other times you read such a diary, but then you come across some other information about them that amplifies the picture and makes you realize that the same boring dull events, in the light of a larger context, could be compelling.

“Disassembly is about combinations in which some subentities are not fully fulfilled or fulfilled in ways that allow for more complex connections, and other entities are--you see or sense--are just not going anywhere meaningful, but are not energy deficient or lacking in info. It’s a matter of fulfillment–the difference between being able to go somewhere, actually going there, and not being able to go there without having to drag another along. ‘It’s sort of like a ladies’ restroom.’ CT, bad bad bad. He makes his point... with his head.

“See, existence seeks fulfillment, and so any impediment to that will generate its own solution. Just plug that phrase in the old PtoPs. Because... and here’s another new thought I have shared before... if this were not true, existence would have wound down in the fullness of being into nonbeing. I think that’s enough for now.” (2/13/2011 - Y#130)




“So, here we are, and the same issues we started years ago: about people thinking that definition is about differentiation, and not about connection. Instead of thinking about how you can stand out and make a difference, how about where you can fit in and fulfill. Ego crap.

“In the short term spiritual view, you think you need to know yourself and to thyself be true. But in the total flow of All, it matters if your piece of the larger whole becomes ready to complete the picture. Hey, the jigsaw puzzle piece by itself under the couch is worthless--except as a minute glimpse of the possible grander whole.

“The only reason to differentiate is to be able to clearly see one’s role in the unfolding of meaning larger than one. A single integer has value only in its equation, but its value must be known and understood. But to know and understand it standing alone means nothing. So, you’re 5, so what? But 5 as part of something has meaning. Ponder that.

“People either want you to be blindly part of something or knowingly yourself, but I suggest something more.” (5/1/2011 - Y#131)




“If you are not willing to be uncomfortable, then you are not open to change, so you must think or feel you are fulfilled at the point you are–which is the biggest conceit of the ego. And those who try to argue that they’ve found a release from craving more and are comfortable as they are, are the biggest egoists.

“It takes an inflated self to think there’s no room for growth. Self-satisfied is being satisfied with the self that already is. Ain’t no future in that, babe. Because if you aren’t learning and remembering, it’s going to be a long squat on the wayside bench. And the rest of the potentially more complex entity might just get tired and leave with someone else, and then where would you fit? Nowhere. So, back to basics, as it were. If you are not moving along, then the universe may think you have no potential. ‘We had such high hopes for them, but they let a little setback stop them.’

“Then there are those who spend tremendous energy exploring infinitesimal realms–the nuances of the trivial or the minutia of the meaningless. Ok, you get the point: Often more involved in converting others than living for oneself.” (5/24/2011 - Y#132)



“I am not the way, but just a wayfarer. Like
monotheism, the new understandings will appear as if new in many places. And it is happening. Remember, it took monotheism centuries to catch on. And lots of wandering. Being lost is a prelude to finding.” (9/2/2011 - Y#133)

Page 2

Collected Points to Ponder Menu


Table Of Contents

Last Update: 1/30/2012
Web Author:
the Rev Dr Randolph and Elissa Bishop Becker, M.Ed., LPC, NCC
Copyright ©1998-2012 by the Rev Dr Randolph and Elissa Bishop Becker

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED